Journal of Infectious Diseases and Treatment Open Access

  • ISSN: 2472-1093
  • Journal h-index: 8
  • Journal CiteScore: 1.06
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.77
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Abstract

Comparative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serology in healthcare workers with Abbott Architect, Roche Elecsys and The Binding site ELISA immunoassays

Whitelegg Alison

Statement of Problem: SARS-CoV-2 serology testing is key for assessing seroprevalence and antibody response post-vaccination in immunocompromised patients. Consequently, several immunoassays have been designed to meet global laboratory infrastructures. However, immunoassay performance has been primarily elucidated through severe COVID-19 patient-samples, whereby, combination of high viral-load and robust immune-responses could overestimate assay sensitivities. Therefore, accurate detection of both asymptomatic and non-hospitalised individuals is pivotal for SARS-CoV-2 serological assay development. We therefore evaluated the Abbott, Roche and TBS immunoassays in nonhospitalised healthcare workers to identify both assay sensitivities and redefine assay thresholds required for optimisation. 
Methodology: 252 samples were collected from Portsmouth Hospital University NHS Trust (PHU) and The Dudley Group NHS Trust and analysed for SARS-CoV-2 serology. We derived concordance, agreement and assay performance as well as using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to redefine the assay threshold of the Abbott assay. 
Findings: Result concordance between the Abbott and TBS was 66%. Discrepant samples were analysed using the Roche assay which showed 100% agreement with the TBS assay. In samples analysed >58 days post-PCR, the sensitivity of Abbott and Roche was 100%. In samples analysed >100 days post-PCR the sensitivity of the Abbott assay dropped to 77.2% but remained at 100% for the Roche assay. A redefined Abbott threshold of 0.64 increased the sensitivity to 90% giving results similar to the Roche and TBS assays. 
Conclusion: This study demonstrated Abbott assay had a lower sensitivity in comparison to TBS and Roche. Our findings established TBS can be implemented as a viable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 serology testing where high-throughput assays are not available on site. Furthermore, anti-spike assays, such as TBS, could be used to monitor vaccination responses to deduce SARS-CoV-2 population-immunity. Further optimisation studies are required to evaluate the performance characteristics of these assays which could facilitate widescale sero-epidemiological surveillance.