Interventional Cardiology Journal Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8157
  • Journal h-index: 5
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.33
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.26
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Perspective - (2022) Volume 8, Issue 12

Cellular Cardiomyoplasty, or Cell-Based Cardiac Repair, A New Potential Therapeutic
Taha Hussein*
 
Department of Cardiology, Mansoura University, Egypt
 
*Correspondence: Taha Hussein, Department of Cardiology, Mansoura University, Egypt, Email:

Received: 30-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. IPIC-23-15459; Editor assigned: 02-Dec-2022, Pre QC No. IPIC-23-15459 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Dec-2022, QC No. IPIC-23-15459; Revised: 21-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. IPIC-23-15459 (R); Published: 30-Dec-2022, DOI: 10.21767/2471-8157.8.12.59

INTRODUCTION

Cell cardiomyoplasty, or cell-based cardiovascular fix, is another possible helpful methodology wherein begetter cells are utilized to fix locales of harmed or necrotic myocardium. Experimental animal models and some human clinical trials have demonstrated that transplanted progenitor cells can improve heart function. In November 2011, a large group of collaborators at Abbott Northwestern and the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation discovered that there was no significant difference in any markers or Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) between a group of patients who received cellular cardiomyoplasty and a group of patients who received control therapy. All of the patients in this study had a MI, underwent a PCI, and received progenitor cell infusions two to three weeks after the procedure.

Description

In a review that is in progress (February 2012), nonetheless, more certain outcomes were being accounted for: At 4 months after implant, patients treated with autologous cardiac stem cells after a MI were found to have statistically significant increases in LVEF and decreases in infarct size compared to the control group in the SCIPIO trial. At one year, positive outcomes are even more evident. A non-specific "Expression of concern" regarding the paper was recently published in The Lancet. Subsequently, another preclinical study found that the special cells only have a limited capacity for generating new cardiomyocytes, casting doubt on the justification for using them. As a result, experts now question the need to continue. The ideal progenitor cells have not yet been discovered or produced. The use of Embryonic Stem Cells (ESC) was the first obvious choice when the objective was to recreate human tissue. Although animal studies have demonstrated restoration of cardiac function, immunologic rejection issues and the formation of teratomas have made ESCs a high risk. These pluripotent cells can conceptually give rise to any somatic cell line in the human body. A cell line derived from somatic cells that have been induced by a combination of transcription factors are known as human-induced pluripotent stem cells. In many ways, the iPSC line is very similar to ESCs and shows great promise for cardiac potential. However, this cell line is also subpar due to its inability to mature into a homogeneous culture, making it immunogenic and teratogenic. The adult stem cell derived from bone marrow or cardiac tissue explants is a third cell line with great potential and no known safety issues. Multiple studies have demonstrated that adult stem cells do possess cardiogenic potential. Adult stem cells have only a small chance of succeeding in regenerating human myocardium at this time. Three significant difficulties have been noticed. Grown-up foundational microorganisms display an insignificant obligation to engraft into the harmed myocardium, they have low endurance rates and they have restricted multiplication.

Conclusion

The work of donated stem cells that remain in the damaged myocardium for just a few days to a few weeks after delivery is the source of the positive effects that are currently being observed in clinical trials. Clearly, these effects could be significantly enhanced if cell survival is prolonged. This is where the majority of current research is conducted, and a number of promising methodologies exist.

Acknowledgement

The author is grateful to the journal editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflict of Interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Citation: Hussein T (2022) Cellular Cardiomyoplasty, or Cell-Based Cardiac Repair, a New Potential Therapeutic. Interv Cardiol J. 12:59.

Copyright: © 2022 Hussein T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.