Commentary - (2023) Volume 8, Issue 1
Received: 02-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. IPPHR-23-15686; Editor assigned: 04-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. IPPHR-23-15686 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jan-2022, QC No. IPPHR-23-15686; Revised: 23-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. IPPHR-23-15686 (R); Published: 30-Jan-2023, DOI: 10.21767/2574-2817-8.1.3
Child development and early childhood education have been strongly related for many centuries. Knowledge of child development is vital in early childhood education and care because information on the children’s development identifies their developmental level to help make educational decisions about the children’s instruction. Child development is not a unified, with a single integrated set of theories, nor does one theory or set of theories predominate. Rather, there are many different competing theories in the field. Child development theories are modified when results from research studies challenge their theory. Only some developmental theories describe changes in the children’s growth. Each theory offers interpretations on the meaning of the children’s development and behavior. Although the theories are clustered collectively into schools of thought, they differ within each school. Each theory identifies activities that are developmentally appropriate for young children. Froebel and Owen established the initial early childhood education programs, which occurred before the emergence of child development.
Maturation theory indicates that an individual’s hereditary has the most impact on the children’s development. As they develop, their genetic aptitude progresses. Harsh environmental situations can only delay but not generate or improve their aptitude. Based on this theory, children need to be provided with developmentally appropriate learning experiences. Difficult experiences will only discourage the children and optimal learning and progress will not occur. The maturationists’ philosophy provides a fundamental understanding that has a foremost impact on early childhood education theory and practice. It affects the way that educational researchers, policymakers, and practitioners recognize young children’s development and its implications for researching and educating them. They think that development is a biological progression that gradually emerges instinctively in inevitable. Contributed his personal approach to both psychology and education. Hall’s research in child study indicated that development depends on genetics. He also established the fundamental technique of child study, which is based on observation. Since during this period, qualified child psychologists were unavailable in the United States, Hall recruited interested individuals to conduct the observations for him.
He gathered huge quantities of evidence about children in an effort to describe children at several periods of life. Hall’s approaches, gathering survey data about children from teachers who were not skilled in observation procedures, would be discounted as scientific nowadays. Nevertheless, with these methods, he surpassed new fields in the enquiry of childhood and formed the foundation for further scientific research in childhood and also the use of child development principles to education. In several respects, Hall was thought to be the initiator of the method to education, the position that education should focus on the nature of childhood instead of making children follow traditional systems of education.
None
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Citation: Phfsarr M (2023) Cooperation with Pediatric Medical Care Suppliers Preceding Affirmation for Pediatric Basic Disease because of Respiratory Disappointment. Pediatr Heal Res. 8:3.
Copyright: © 2023 Phfsarr M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.