Journal of the Pancreas Open Access

Genetic Ethics and the Future of Human Enhancement: Balancing Progress and Responsibility

Gabriele Simonini*^{* 1}Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Canada
^*Correspondence: Gabriele Simonini*, Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Canada, Email:

Received: 30-Sep-2023 Published: 27-Oct-2023, DOI: 10.35841/1590-8577-24.5.831

Introduction

As genetic science continues to advance, the prospect of human enhancement becomes increasingly attainable. The ability to modify and improve our genetic makeup raises profound ethical questions and complex societal issues. In the pursuit of progress and human betterment, it is essential to strike a delicate balance between scientific advancement and the ethical and moral responsibilities that come with it. Human enhancement refers to the use of biotechnological, genetic, and other medical means to improve or augment human physical, cognitive, and emotional capacities. It encompasses a broad spectrum of possibilities, including genetic editing, cognitive enhancement, and even the potential for designer babies with desired traits [1].

The ethical dilemmas associated with human enhancement are multifaceted and far-reaching: Equity and Access: The ability to enhance human capabilities raises concerns about equitable access. Will these technologies be available to all, or will they create disparities between the genetically enhanced and the unenhanced, exacerbating existing inequalities? Consent and Autonomy: In the context of genetic enhancement, the issue of informed consent is particularly complex. Children, in particular, may have their genetic makeup determined by their parents, raising questions about autonomy and consent [2].

 

Unintended Consequences: Genetic modification can lead to unintended consequences. Altered genes may have effects beyond the intended enhancement, potentially causing harm or introducing unknown risks. Health and Longevity: Prolonging life and enhancing physical attributes might have consequences for societal structures, healthcare systems, and environmental sustainability. Ethical considerations extend to the impact of enhanced longevity on resource allocation and intergenerational equity. Biotechnology and Warfare: Advances in human enhancement could have implications for warfare and military applications. Ethical questions arise about the use of such technologies in the context of conflict and their potential for harm [3].

As we navigate the terrain of human enhancement, it is imperative to balance the quest for progress with ethical responsibility. Here are key considerations for achieving this balance: Ethical Frameworks: Develop clear ethical frameworks and guidelines for the responsible use of human enhancement technologies. These frameworks should prioritize individual autonomy, informed consent, and equitable access. Public Dialogue: Engage the public in discussions about human enhancement to ensure that societal values, concerns, and expectations are considered. A transparent and inclusive dialogue can help guide the responsible development and use of these technologies [4].

Precaution and Research: Conduct thorough research on the long-term effects of genetic enhancements. Practicing precaution and avoiding premature implementation can help minimize the potential for unintended consequences. Ethical Responsibility in Research: Researchers in the field of genetics and human enhancement bear a significant ethical responsibility. They must adhere to rigorous ethical standards and engage in responsible research practices [5].

Conclusion

The future of human enhancement, particularly in the realm of genetics, offers remarkable possibilities but also raises complex ethical challenges. Balancing progress and responsibility in this context necessitates a thoughtful and inclusive approach that considers the principles of equity, consent, and human dignity. By engaging in open, transparent dialogues and establishing strong ethical frameworks and regulatory oversight, society can harness the potential of genetic enhancements while preserving our fundamental values and moral responsibilities. The responsible development and use of these technologies will shape the future of human enhancement, creating a path that respects our individuality, autonomy, and shared humanity.

Reference

Indexed In, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed In, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed In, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed In, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed In, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

1. Rueda J. Genetic enhancement, human extinction, and the best interests of posthumanity. Bioethics. 2022. [PMID: 36134439]
2. Cwik B. Moving beyond ‘therapy’and ‘enhancement’in the ethics of gene editing. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019;28(4):695-707. [PMID: 31526421]
3. Filip L. Genetic enhancement, TED talks and the sense of wonder. Med Humanit. 2021;47(2):210-8. [PMID: 34083412]
4. Mikkelsen RB, Frederiksen HR, Gjerris M, Holst B, Hyttel P, Luo Y, et al. Genetic protection modifications: moving beyond the binary distinction between therapy and enhancement for human genome editing. CRISPR J. 2019;2(6):362-9. [PMID: 31860350]
5. Racine E, Sattler S, Boehlen W. Cognitive enhancement: Unanswered questions about human psychology and social behavior. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021;27:1-25. [PMID: 33759032]