European Journal of Experimental Biology Open Access

  • ISSN: 2248-9215
  • Journal h-index: 45
  • Journal CiteScore: 34.35
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 2

Glycemic Index in the Development of Functional Beverage

Ryan D. Francis, Yanique Rodgers, Colleen Salmon, Grace Ann Junior, Perceval S. Bahado-Singh, Ann Marie Smith, Andrew O. Wheatley and Helen N. Asemota*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of the West Indies at Mona Biotechnology Centre, Jamaica

Corresponding Author:

Helen N. Asemota
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University of the West Indies at Mona Biotechnology Centre, Jamaica
Tel: +86-10-82106381
E-mail: helen.asemota@uwimona.edu.jm

Received date: March 09, 2018; Accepted date: April 05, 2018; Published date: April 13, 2018

Citation: Francis RD, Rodgers Y, Salmon C, Junior GA, Bahado-Singh PS, et al. (2018) Glycemic Index in the Development of Functional Beverage. Eur Exp Biol Vol. 8 No. 2:13.

Copyright: © 2018 Francis RD, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at European Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Background: Due to the prevalence of diabetes in Jamaica, an understanding of the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) values of beverages and food can aid dieticians in guiding consumers to choose sensibly. It is reported that consumption of low GI and GL foods may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease and obesity. However, low GI snacks/food available to diabetic patients in Jamaica are very limited. This study was conducted to develop a low GI and GL vegetable drink that could be commercialized.

Methods: Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects (5 males and 5 females) with mean age 30 ± 2 years and mean BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2 were recruited to the study. Using a non-blind, crossover design trial, the subjects consumed equicarbohydrate amounts (25 g of total available carbohydrate) of the vegetable (beetroot – Beta vulgaris, cucumber – Cucumis sativus and carrot – Daucus carota) drink and twice glucose as reference food (25 g of total carbohydrate). Blood glucose was determined after overnight fasting (0 hours) and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the consumption of each test food. The glycemic index (GI) value was calculated geometrically by expressing the incremental area under the blood glucose curve (IAUC) as a percentage of each subject's average IAUC for the standard food.

Results: The GI and GL values of the vegetable drink were found to be 34 ± 10 and 4.4, respectively. As per the Food and Agriculture Organization, GI cut-off values are as follows: low <55; medium 56-69 inclusive, high >70 and for GL, low ≤ 10, medium 10 to 20 or high ≥ 20. Hence the vegetable drink could be classified under low glycemic food/ nutrient.

Conclusion: Identification of beverages and other foods with low glycemic responses may have practical applications in controlling blood glucose levels. This study provides scientific evidence of the blood glucose response of the formulated vegetable drink. The complex carbohydrates in beetroot, carrot and cucumber may be responsible for the low postprandial glycemic response. This will lead to a low demand for insulin secretion from the pancreatic β cells, which are often impaired in type 2 diabetic individuals.

Keywords

Glycemic index; Diabetes; Hyperglycemia

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the leading causes of death in many countries; therefore an effective method of management is of absolute importance. This metabolic disorder is characterized by high blood glucose level and abnormalities in carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism [1]. The rising prevalence of diabetes and its complications in recent times has push scientists to develop means of mitigating further increase. Type 2 diabetes mellitus can be managed by lifestyle changes (diet and exercise) as well as the administration of drugs such as metformin, which aids in the control of the blood glucose. Jenkins and others first postulated the theory of glycemic index at the University of Toronto in 1981 as a means to manage type 2 diabetes [2].

The glycemic index is theoretically defined as the postprandial blood glucose response elicited by a given amount of food that contains 50 g (or in some cases 25 g) of available carbohydrate (CHO), expressed as a percentage of that elicited by 50 g (or 25 g) of the reference carbohydrate (glucose solution or white bread) in the same subject [3]. This index or percentage represents a property of the food, which indicates the quality of the existing carbohydrate. Foods with carbohydrates that are digested, absorbed and utilized quickly are referred to as high glycemic indexed foods (GI ≥ 70). Those absorbed moderately (56-69) are referred to as medium GI foods, while those that are digested, absorbed and utilized slowly are referred to as low GI (GI ≤ 55) foods [4].

Glycemic load represents the product of the GI and the total available carbohydrate content in a specified portion of food divided by 100. GL values are also categorized as low (≤ 10), medium (>10 to <20) or high (≥ 20). Pharmacological interventions aimed at improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes have shown positive results. However, additional improvements in diabetes management have been reported when diets of low GI foods are consumed in comparison to those with high GI foods. To date, it is documented that stringent pharmacologic glycemic controls have not demonstrated the expected distinct benefits for coronary heart disease among type 2 diabetic individuals [5,6]. Therefore, pharmacotherapy may prove to be only part of the solution. These research findings indicate that dietary approaches that both impact on blood glucose control and reduce coronary heart disease risk and associated risk factors should be highlighted. Due to the limitations of current therapies for DM, there remains interest in alternative and/or complementary treatments. This study was conducted to develop a low GI and GL vegetable drink and make it commercially available [7,8].

Materials and Methods

Study population

Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects (5 males and 5 females) were recruited for the study. Subjects were non-smoking, nonalcoholics, moderately active with mean age 30 ± 2 years and mean BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2.

Study design

Non-blind, repeat measure, crossover design trial.

Design of experiment

Proximate analysis for carbohydrate, fat, crude protein, moisture, dietary fiber content and ash were determined using the AOAC standard. Total carbohydrate was done by difference according to FAO/WHO Expert Consultation protocol.

Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects, comprising five (5) males and five (5) females with mean age 30 ± 2 years and BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2 were recruited to the study. Proportion of vegetable drink equivalent to 25 g of available carbohydrate was fed to subjects after a 10 hour overnight fast and their serum glucose levels were determined at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes [9]. The incremental areas under the curve (IAUC) were calculated according to the method of Brouns et al. A cup of glucose, 25 g in 250 ml was used as the standard, which was assigned a GI of 100. Glucose was tested on three separate occasions, and the test foods once. The GI rating (%) for each food, was calculated for each subject by expressing the IAUC of the test food as a percentage of the average IAUC of the glucose standard consumed by that volunteer [10,11]. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of the West Indies and the Faculty of Medical Sciences at the University of the West Indies Mona Campus, Kingston, Jamaica.

Test food

Vegetable drink consisted of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) 2%, cucumber – (Cucumis sativus) 6%, and carrot (Daucus carota) 25% as main ingredients.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Data obtained from the experiments are expressed as mean ± SE. Values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant using Students t test [12].

Results

Table 1 shows the proximate composition of the vegetable drink. The crude protein (0.17 g), ash (0.09 g), moisture (97.0%), total sugar (2.40 g), iron (<0.10 mg/ml), vitamin C (3.70 mg/ml) and carbohydrate (5.30 g) was determined in 100 ml of vegetable drink. Figure 1 and Table 2 shows the mean blood glucose values after consumption of vegetable drink and glucose standard [13-15].

Sample % Crude Protein % Ash % Moisture % Total Sugar Iron mg/ml Vitamin C mg/ml % Carbohydrate
Vegetable Drink 0.17 0.09 97 2.4 <0.10 3.7 5.3

\r\n\r\n

Table 1: Proximate composition of vegetable drink (100 ml).

\"experimental-biology-blood-glucose-concentration\"

Figure 1: Mean blood glucose concentration in healthy subjects after consumption of glucose or vegetable drink.

\"experimental-biology-glucose-vegetable\"

Figure 2: Incremental AUC for blood glucose concentration in healthy subjects after consumption of glucose or vegetable drink.

There was a significant increase in the postprandial blood glucose levels after consumption of glucose standard (P ≤ 0.05) when compared to the vegetable drink. In addition, the vegetable drink showed a significantly lower overall blood glucose response during the first two hours after consumption than the glucose standard [16,17]. Hence the mean IAUC of the vegetable drink was observed to be significantly lower (32.6 ± 8) than that of the glucose standard. The GI value of the vegetable drink was found to be low (34.6 ± 9). GI values can be categorized as low <55, medium 56-69 inclusive and high >70. Similarly, the GL (high ≥ 20, medium 11-19 and low ≤ 10) of the vegetable drink was determined to be low (4.4) [18].

Discussion

The vegetable drink showed significantly lower glycemic response compared to the glucose standard (P ≤ 0.05) [19]. The vegetable drink had a low GI of 34.6 ± 9 and a low GL of 4.4. This low GI and GL could be due to the fiber content of the main ingredients (beetroot, cucumber and carrot) of the drink. The dietary fiber could alter the digestion and adsorption of the carbohydrate present and thereby influence blood glucose response [20,21]. The presence of acidity may also alter blood glucose response indirectly by slowing down gastric emptying, resulting in slower rate of digestion with subsequent reduction in glucose absorption.

The GL of the vegetable drink assesses the glycemic effect of the serving sizes of different foods. The GL of the vegetables drink was determined to be low based on the recommended serving size of 240 ml for beverages. Similar results of low GI (30 ± 3) and low GL (7) was observed by researchers in Australia when investigating glycemic response of a banana smoothie drink [22,23]. They also reported the GI of a popular carbonated drink to be medium (68 ± 6) and GL high (23). Other researchers in the United States of America also investigated the GI and GL of a popular carbonated beverage and a fruit punch, however, both beverages were reported to have high GI and GL. Researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa investigated the GI and GL of four local drinks and reported that the four drinks had low GI, however the GL of the drinks were medium. Studies conducted by Salmeron et al. and Schulze et al. demonstrated that foods with high GL elevate glycemia and insulinemia in human subjects [24,25]. In addition, the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases also increases with consumption of foods with high GI and GL. However, consuming foods with low GI and GL will have health and disease prevention benefits according to researchers Egan, Read, Riley, & Atiomo, Salehi and Yousefinejad & Pishdad [26-28]. Therefore, the vegetable drink formulated in this study with a low GI and GL may have beneficial health effects if made available to patients with diabetes and its associated complications, as well as to individuals that are interested in consuming a healthy diet. Considering the prevalence of diabetes in Jamaica, the identification of drinks and other foods with low GI and GL may be useful to health care providers and nutritionists when giving dietary guidance to patients. Consumption of low GI beverages and snacks may aid in better management or prevention of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity [29,30].

Conclusion

This study provides scientific evidence of the glucose response of the formulated vegetable drink. This low GI and GL of the vegetable drink may be useful for diabetic patients as well as healthy individuals that are seeking a healthy alternative to the high carbohydrate beverages currently available in Jamaica. The availability of low GI and GL drinks, foods or snacks in the Jamaican market may aid in preventing or better management diabetes and its associated metabolic disorders.

References

  1. Ajala O, English P, Pinkney J (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 97: 505-516.
  2. Anderson JW, Randles KM, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ (2004) Carbohydrate and fiber recommendations for individuals with diabetes: a quantitative assessment and meta-analysis of the evidence. J Am Coll Nutr 23: 5-17.
  3. Attanayake AP, Jayatilaka KAPW, Pathirana C, Mudduwa LKB (2016) Gmelina arborea Roxb. (Family: Verbenaceae) Extract Upregulates the-Cell Regeneration in STZ Induced Diabetic Rats. Journal of Diabetes Research 501: 1-8.
  4. Atayoglu AT, Soylu M, Silici S, Inanc N (2016) Glycemic index values of monofloral Turkish honeys and the effect of their consumption on glucose metabolism. Turk J Med Sci 46: 483-488.
  5. Augustin LS, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ, Willett WC, Astrup A, et al. (2015) Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: an International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC) Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 25: 795-815.
  6. Bahado-Singh PS, Riley CK, Wheatley AO, Lowe HI (2011) Relationship between processing method and the glycemic indices of ten sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivars commonly consumed in Jamaica. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2011: 1-6.
  7. Barclay AW, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J, Flood VM, Prvan T, et al. (2008) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk—a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 627-637.
  8. Brand-Miller JC, Foster-Powell K, Atkinson F (2014) The low GI shopper’s guide to GI values 2014: the authoritative source of glycemic index values for more than 1.200 foods. Philadelphia: Da Capo Press.
  9. Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S (2003) Low–Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 26: 2261-2267.
  10. Brand-Miller J, Holt S, Pawlak D, McMillan J (2002) Glycemic Index and Obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 76: 281-285.
  11. Brouns F, Bjorck I, Frayn KN, Gibbs AL, Lang V, et al. (2005) Glycemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 18: 145-171.
  12. Chang KT, Lampe JW, Schwarz Y, Breymeyer KL, Noar KA, et al. (2012) Low glycemic load experimental diet more satiating than high glycemic load diet. Nutr Cancer 64: 666-673.
  13. Crawford P, Thai C, Obholz J, Schievenin J, True M, et al. (2016) Assessment of the effect of lifestyle intervention plus water-soluble cinnamon extract on lowering blood glucose in pre-diabetics, a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 17: 1-6.
  14. Egan N, Read A, Riley P, Atiomo W (2011) Evaluating compliance to a low glycaemic index (GI) diet in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) BMC research notes 4: 53.
  15. Eli-Cophie D, Agbenorhevi JK, Annan RA (2017) Glycemic index of some local staples in Ghana. Food Sci Nutr 5: 131-138.
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization – FAO, World Health Organization – WHO (1998) Carbohydrates in human nutrition. Geneva.
  17. Food Nutrition Institute (1998) Food Composition Tables for Use in the English-Speaking Caribbean. Kingston: Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute.
  18. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76: 5-56.
  19. Gomina M, Adkou N, Sina H, Vodounon C, Saka D, et al. (2016) Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Four Local Alcoholic Drinks of Benin. Int J Biochem Res Rev 11: 1.
  20. Karthik D, Ravikumar S (2011) A Study on the Protective Effect of Cynodon dactylon Leaves Extract in Diabetic Rats. Biomed Environ Sci 24: 190-199.
  21. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E (2002) Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346: 393-403.
  22. Levitan EB, Mittleman MA, Wolk A (2010) Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction in women. Br J Nutr 103: 1049-1055.
  23. Ley SH, Hamdy O, Mohan V, Hu FB (2014) Prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: dietary components and nutritional strategies. The Lancet 383: 1999-2007.
  24. Liu S, Manson JE (2001) Dietary carbohydrates, physical inactivity, obesity, and the ‘metabolic syndrome’as predictors of coronary heart disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 12: 395-404.
  25. Moosheer SM, Waldschütz W, Itariu BK, Brath H, Stulnig TM (2014) A protein-enriched low glycemic index diet with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation exerts beneficial effects on metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes 8: 308-314.
  26. Salehi M, Yousefinejad A, Pishdad G (2012) The effect of a diet education with six iso-caloric meals on the body weight and blood glucose of diabetes type 2 patients. J Food Sci Technol 32: 329-333.
  27. Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, et al. (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Jama 277: 472-477.
  28. Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, et al. (2004) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 348-356.
  29. Sieri S, Krogh V, Berrino F, Evangelista A, Agnoli C, et al. (2010) Dietary glycemic load and index and risk of coronary heart disease in a large italian cohort: the EPICOR study. Arch Intern Med 170: 640-647.
  30. Turnbull FM, Abraira C, Anderson RJ, Byington RP, Chalmers JP, et al. (2009) Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52: 2288-2298.