Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8165
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.44
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.86
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days

Perspective - (2022) Volume 8, Issue 11

Gynecological and obstetric Care: Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors in Health Education: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers' Views in Germany
Azevedo Gomes*
 
Department of Maternal-Child Nursing and Public Health, Faculty of Nursing, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil
 
*Correspondence: Azevedo Gomes, Department of Maternal-Child Nursing and Public Health, Faculty of Nursing, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil, Email:

Received: 25-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-15504; Editor assigned: 27-Oct-2022, Pre QC No. IPGOCR-23-15504 (PQ); Reviewed: 09-Nov-2022, QC No. IPGOCR-23-15504 (Q); Revised: 15-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-15504 (R); Published: 22-Nov-2022, DOI: 10.36648/2471-8165.8.11.54

INTRODUCTION

A variety of health issues are linked to lifestyle-related risk factors (LRRFs) during pregnancy and breastfeeding. But prior research has revealed that pregnant women are largely ignorant of the consequences of LRRFs. The purpose of this study was to examine, from the perspective of healthcare professionals health education relates to gynaecological and obstetric care during pregnancy and breastfeeding. A qualitative study was carried out to investigate healthcare providers' perspectives. 2019 saw the conducting of 22 in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 9 gynaecologists and 13 midwives. Participants were drawn from various inpatient and outpatient care facilities as well as from rural, urban, and underdeveloped social areas in southern Germany. All of the interviews were verbatim recorded on tape and transcribed.

Description

Additionally, a number of studies have discovered that LRRFs during lactation have a detrimental effect on the health of the children. For instance, within 30 to 60 minutes after drinking alcohol, breast milk reaches the same alcohol levels as maternal blood levels LRRFs during pregnancy can result in significant personal, societal, and financial costs. For instance, a kid with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) may experience a variety of developmental difficulties that have an estimated lifetime cost of USD 1,926,000 in terms of money. LRRFs are both avoidable and preventable, at the same time. To lessen the harmful effects of LRRFs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, it may be useful to educate HCPs and women about these substances in the context of gynaecological and obstetric care. The effectiveness of health education may be connected to its acceptance among patients and H Cps. Health education interventions on dental health, smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity during pregnancy were effective at launching short- and long-term health behaviour changes. Pregnant women are quite appreciative of health education, according to a study from the Netherlands. In particular, because of the high levels of uncertainty they experience during pregnancy, women may be more receptive to and accepting of health education, which could boost effectiveness. It could be more effective to try to reach women before conception, though, considering the impacts of Surfs from conception onward [1-4].

The majority of HCPs attested to the great value of LRRF education. But in reality, information about LRRFs throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding is not routinely distributed and is frequently coincidental and scant. Health education is reportedly given less priority in many inpatient healthcare settings than it is in outpatient settings. This is especially true given that the majority of pregnant women visit inpatient healthcare facilities late in their pregnancy, when it is recommended that education about pregnancy begin at the beginning of the pregnancy. Inpatient treatment is typically used in Germany by pregnant women who have identified risk factors or when complications arise. This may help to explain why, in these specific situations, other problems are seen as being more urgent and significant. However, the majority of inpatient hospitals do hold an informational evening [5,6].

The majority of HCPs currently use a demand-driven healthcare approach with an individual thematic focus, guided by the woman's medical history, needs, and circumstances. This is due to the lack of clear guidelines, checklists, and an overall vision that was previously mentioned, as well as the barriers to implementation that were mentioned. The demand-driven healthcare model is centred on the patient's unique needs as determined by a result; the assessment of the pregnant woman's understanding informs the information given to her. The adoption of thorough lifestyle counselling during pregnancy is required for knowledge increase and behaviour change in the targeted population because we found significant knowledge gaps among a mostly well-educated research sample in a prior study [7]. Counselling, however, may be stretched across a number of sessions and practitioners, sessions and providers, for instance, given the need for extensive lifestyle counselling. Other healthcare professionals' engagement, such as dietitians, may relieve the burden on s and improve the care given to expectant mothers. Midwifery care is subject to unfavourable rules and conditions, including professional and social hurdles as well as economic barriers including low or missing wages, a lack of state financial commitment, and informal payments.

Conclusion

The provision of high-quality midwifery care is hampered by these obstacles. Author discovered that the delivery of health education is hampered by poorly defined and undefined roles, which is in line with the findings of other examination.

References

  1. Heaman M, Gupton A, Gregory D (2004) Factors influencing pregnant women's perceptions of risk. MCN: Am J Matern Child Nurs29(2):111-116.
  2. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  3. Radoń-Pokracka M, Adrianowicz B, Płonka M, Danił P, Nowak M, et al. (2019) Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age. Maced J Med Sci 7(12):1951.
  4. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  5. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Kennedy A, Koeller KK (2005) From the archives of the AFIP: a comprehensive review of fetal tumors with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 25(1):215-242.
  6. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  7. Silva TV, Bento SF, Katz L, Pacagnella RC (2021) Preterm birth risk, me? Women risk perception about premature delivery–a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(1):1-7.
  8. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  9. Benacerraf BR, Minton KK, Benson CB, Bromley BS, Coley BD, et al. Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218(1):19-28.
  10. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  11. Rajbanshi S, Mohd NN, Hazlina NHN (2021) Risk perceptions among high-risk pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Chil 21(1):1-8.
  12. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  13. Feygin T, Khalek N, Moldenhauer JS (2020) Fetal brain, head, and neck tumors: Prenatal imaging and management. Prenat Diagn 40(10):1203-1219.
  14. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

Citation: Gomes A (2022) Gynecological and obstetric Care Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors in Health Education: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Views in Germany. Gynecol Obstet Case Rep. Vol.8 No.11:54.

Copyright: © Gomes A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.