Journal of the Pancreas Open Access

  • ISSN: 1590-8577
  • Journal h-index: 82
  • Journal CiteScore: 35.06
  • Journal Impact Factor: 24.75
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days

Perspective - (2024) Volume 25, Issue 4

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Epidemiology Diagnosis and Management
IIiya Gutin*#
 
1Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
#Equally contribution
 
*Correspondence: IIiya Gutin, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom,

Published: 24-Aug-2024

Abstract

        

Introduction

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a distinct and less common subset of pancreatic tumors that originate from the endocrine cells of the pancreas. Unlike the more prevalent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), PNETs are characterized by their varied clinical presentations and generally more favorable prognosis, though they can still present significant challenges in terms of diagnosis and management. These tumors arise from the pancreatic islet cells, which are responsible for producing hormones such as insulin and glucagon. Understanding the epidemiology, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for PNETs is crucial for improving patient outcomes and guiding clinical practice [1].

Epidemiologically, PNETs are relatively rare compared to exocrine pancreatic tumors, accounting for approximately 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. They can occur sporadically or as part of hereditary syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome. The incidence of PNETs has been increasing in recent years, partly due to advancements in imaging technology and greater awareness among clinicians, which have led to more frequent and earlier detection of these tumors [2].

The clinical presentation of PNETs is highly variable, depending on the type of hormone produced by the tumor. Functional PNETs, such as insulinomas or gastrinomas, may cause specific endocrine symptoms related to hormone overproduction, while non-functional PNETs often present with non-specific symptoms or are discovered incidentally during imaging for unrelated conditions. This variability can complicate the diagnostic process, necessitating a high index of suspicion and targeted diagnostic evaluation [3].

Diagnostic approaches for PNETs typically involve a combination of imaging studies and biochemical assays. Advanced imaging techniques, such as multiphase computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, are critical for identifying tumor location, size, and metastatic spread. Additionally, biochemical markers, including serum chromogranin A and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), can provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. However, the diagnosis of PNETs often requires histological confirmation through biopsy or surgical resection [4].

Management of PNETs is influenced by several factors, including tumor type, stage, grade, and functional status. For localized tumors, surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment and offers the best chance for a cure. The extent of surgery depends on the tumor's size and location, as well as the presence of metastases. For tumors that are not amenable to surgery or for those with metastatic disease, a multidisciplinary approach is essential. Treatment options may include systemic therapies such as targeted agents, chemotherapy, and somatostatin analogs, which can help control tumor growth and manage symptoms [5].

Targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, have been developed specifically for PNETs and have shown promise in controlling tumor progression in cases that are not surgically resectable. Additionally, the use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a novel treatment modality for PNETs, leveraging targeted radiation to address metastatic disease. These advances highlight the ongoing progress in the development of tailored therapies for this unique group of tumors [6].

The management of PNETs also involves addressing the specific hormonal syndromes associated with functional tumors. For example, insulinomas require careful management of blood glucose levels, while gastrinomas necessitate treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Symptomatic control and quality of life are important considerations, particularly for patients with functional tumors that significantly impact daily living [7].

Despite advances in the understanding and treatment of PNETs, challenges remain in optimizing patient outcomes. Tumor heterogeneity, variability in clinical presentation, and the potential for late recurrence or metastasis necessitate ongoing monitoring and individualized care. Research into the molecular mechanisms underlying PNETs and the development of novel therapeutic agents are critical for improving management strategies and patient outcomes [8].

Diagnosis of PNETs poses unique challenges due to their varied presentation and the nonspecific nature of symptoms, which can range from hormonal syndromes such as insulinoma or gastrinoma to asymptomatic lesions found incidentally on imaging studies. The clinical presentation often depends on the type and secretion profile of the tumor, with functional tumors causing symptoms related to hormone overproduction. This variability necessitates a high index of suspicion and a thorough evaluation to accurately diagnose and classify PNETs [9].

Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of PNETs. Advanced modalities such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are commonly used to detect and characterize these tumors. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is particularly valuable for its ability to provide detailed images of pancreatic lesions and facilitate biopsy. Each imaging technique offers distinct advantages and limitations, making a multimodal approach often necessary for comprehensive evaluation [10].

Conclusion

Early detection remains a cornerstone in improving survival rates for pancreatic neoplasms, offering a critical opportunity to shift the treatment paradigm from palliative care to potentially curative interventions. The ability to identify pancreatic tumors at an earlier, more manageable stage can significantly enhance the effectiveness of surgical resection and other therapeutic modalities, thereby extending patient survival and improving overall outcomes. Recent advancements in screening technologies, including high-resolution imaging, novel biomarkers, and innovative diagnostic techniques, have made it increasingly feasible to detect pancreatic neoplasms before they progress to advanced stages. These advancements, combined with a deeper understanding of the disease's early manifestations and risk factors, provide a foundation for more effective screening strategies

References

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Kröner PT, Engels MM, Glicksberg BS. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(40):6794. [PMID: 34790008]
  2. Murphy B, Winter DC, Kavanagh DO. Small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosis and management—a narrative review. Front Surg. 2019;6:25. [PMID: 31157232]
  3. Beck KR, Shergill AK. Colonoscopy in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnosis, timing, and bowel preparation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018;28(3):379-90. [PMID: 29933782]
  4. Ierardi AM, Urbano J, De Marchi G. New advances in lower gastrointestinal bleeding management with embolotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150934. [PMID: 26764281]
  5. Barnert J, Messmann H. Diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(11):637-46. [PMID: 19881516]
  6. Sengupta N. The role of colonoscopy and endotherapy in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;42:101615. [PMID: 31785729]
  7. Ingason AB, Hreinsson JP, Björnsson ES. Gastrointestinal bleeding on oral anticoagulation: what is currently known. Drug Saf. 2022;45(12):1449-56. [PMID: 36227528]
  8. Seth A, Khan MA, Nollan R. Does urgent colonoscopy improve outcomes in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding?. Am J Med Sci. 2017;353(3):298-306. [PMID: 28262219]
  9. Tanabe S. Diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Endosc. 2016;49(6):539. [PMID: 38395486]
  10. Tonolini M, Bianco R. Acute HIV-related gastrointestinal disorders and complications in the antiretroviral era: spectrum of cross-sectional imaging findings. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:994-1004. [PMID: 23404378]

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.