Review Article - (2017) Volume 25, Issue 6
Motoko Kawashima*
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Miki Uchino
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Sachiko Inoue
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Norihiko Yokoi
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Kazuo Tsubota
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Corresponding Author:
Motoko Kawashima
Department of Ophthalmology
Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 81(3) 3353- 1211
E-mail: motoko-k@a3.keio.jp
Submitted date: November 28, 2017; Accepted date: December 04, 2017; Published date: December 04, 2017
Background: Dietary supplement use has not been studied well in non-Western societies. There have been no surveys on the prevalence of dietary supplement use among professionals, in particular, ophthalmologists, and is unknown to what extent ophthalmologists recommend dietary supplements to their dry eye patients.
Methods: A survey questionnaire was administered online and per mail in February 2017 to approximately 600 ophthalmologist members of the Dry Eye Society, Japan. The ophthalmologists were asked questions on their personal use of dietary supplements and whether they recommended dietary supplements to their patients.
Results: The 196 ophthalmologists who responded to this survey were aged between 28 and 77 years (mean age, 50.2 ± 10.1 years) and 59.2% were women. A total of 67.9% recommended supplements to their patients; the main target diseases were age-related macular degeneration (97.0%) and dry eye (45.9%). For dry eye, the three most commonly cited reasons for recommending supplements in practice included, 1) expectation of a positive effect, 2) requests by patients, and 3) availability of a product manufactured by a reputable company. The three most commonly recommended components included lactoferrin, the omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and lactic acid bacterium. The ophthalmologists who reported not recommending dietary supplements cited lack of evidence (54.8%), lack of information on which supplements to recommend to patients (38.5%), and high cost (increasing the patients' out of pocket charges) (35.6%) as their main reasons. Regarding their own approach to a healthy diet and lifestyle, almost all ophthalmologists reported adopting a healthy lifestyle such as exercising, positive thinking, and implementing dietary restrictions. A total of 62.2% stated currently using dietary supplements. Those who reported not using any supplements cited sufficient evidence as the main prerequisite to consider using them (75.7%).
Conclusion: The majority of ophthalmologists in this study recommended dietary supplements to their dry eye patients following to macular degeneration patients. Many also reported using dietary supplements regularly as part of their own approach to a healthy diet and lifestyle. More evidence and data on their effectiveness and side effects on dietary supplements should be required for their appropriate and safe use.
Keywords
Dietary supplements; Survey; Ophthalmologists; Health habits
Abbreviations
DHA: Docosahexaenoic Acid; EPA: Eicosapentaenoic Acid; SD: Standard Deviation
Background
According to national surveys, including the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), dietary supplements are being used by the majority of adults in the USA [1,2]. While the prevalence of dietary supplement intake has also increased in Japan [3], few reports on the use of supplements by health professionals and the general population exist. In particular, no study has assessed the use of dietary supplements among healthcare professionals and physicians; moreover, it has not been analyzed if physicians recommend dietary supplements to their patients.
Recently, several studies reported that dietary supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids and lactoferrin are beneficial in the treatment and/or prevent of dry eye disease [4-8]; however, it is not clear if dietary supplements are used in practice.
Therefore, we conducted a survey to examine if ophthalmologists in Japan recommended dietary supplements to their patients and their reasons for doing so (or not). We also assessed their own supplement intake and health habits.
Methods
The study sample consisted of ophthalmologist members of the Dry Eye Society in Japan who specialize on the ocular surface. A survey questionnaire including questions on their personal use of dietary supplements use and if they recommended supplements to their patients was administered online and per mail in February 2017 to 600 ophthalmologists of the society. The ophthalmologists were asked to identify the specific products they used and answered questions about their personal attitudes on supplements, health and wellness. Moreover, they were asked whether they “ever recommended dietary supplements” to their patients, to specify the target diseases, and the reasons for recommending or not recommending supplements for dry eye.
Ethics, consent and permissions: This research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved prospectively by the Ethical Review Board of the Haneginomori Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Results
A total of 196 ophthalmologists (mean age 50.2 ± 10.1 years, range 28-77 years; 59.2% women) responded to the survey. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the study sample.
Sex, N (%) | Female | 116 (59.2) |
Male | 80 (40.8) | |
Age, years, mean ± SD (range) | 50.2 ± 10.1 (28–77) | |
Workplace, N (%) | Private clinic | 128 (65.3) |
Hospital | 65 (33.2) | |
Other | 3 (1.5) | |
Patients seen per month, mean ± SD | 829.4 ± 595.1 | |
Dry eye patients seen per month, mean ± SD | 192.4 ± 191.2 |
SD: Standard Deviation
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the ophthalmologists included in the study (N=196).
Of the surveyed ophthalmologists, 67.9% reported recommending dietary supplements to their patients. They cited the main target diseases of age-related macular degeneration (97.0%) and dry eye (45.9%) (Table 2).
N | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Recommended dietary supplements to ophthalmology patients | Yes | 133 | 67.9 |
No | 61 | 31 | |
No answer | 2 | 1 | |
Target disease, if answering "yes"* | Age-related macular degeneration | 129 | 97.0 |
Dry eye | 61 | 45.9 | |
Asthenopia | 42 | 31.6 | |
Presbyopia | 14 | 10.5 | |
Allergic conjunctivitis | 8 | 6.0 | |
Cataract | 8 | 6.0 | |
Glaucoma | 6 | 4.5 | |
Other | 5 | 3.8 |
*Multiple answers were allowed.
Table 2: Specifics of the recommendations for dietary supplements.
For the treatment of dry eye disease, the ophthalmologists applied a variety of eye drops such as diquafosol, rebamipide, and hyaluronate sodium. Moreover, they recommended measures of self-care, including lid hygiene (61.7%) and the use of warm compresses (71.4%). A total of 31.1% of the ophthalmologists reported that they recommended dietary supplements to their dry eye patients (Table 3).
N | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Eyedrops | Artificial tears | 157 | 80.1 |
Hyaluronate sodium | 180 | 91.8 | |
Diquafosol | 192 | 98.0 | |
Rebamipide | 184 | 93.9 | |
Serum eye drops | 57 | 29.1 | |
Low-concentration steroids | 140 | 71.4 | |
Cyclosporine | 18 | 9.2 | |
Others | 7 | 3.6 | |
Punctal plugs | 170 | 86.7 | |
Lid hygiene | 121 | 61.7 | |
Lid-warming device | 140 | 71.4 | |
Dietary Supplements | 61 | 31.1 | |
Others | 12 | 6.1 |
*Multiple answers were allowed.
Table 3: Types of treatments recommended for dry eye by the ophthalmologists (N = 196).
In this study, we founded out that a total of 31.1% of the ophthalmologist recommended dietary supplements to their dry eye patients.
The top three reasons for recommending dietary supplements in practice were 1) expectation of a positive treatment effect (85.2%), 2) requests by patients (39.3%), and 3) availability of a product manufactured by a reputable company (36.1%). The three dietary supplements the ophthalmologists recommended most included lactoferrin, the omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and lactic acid bacterium. Almost 70% of who recommended dietary supplements reported that they received a positive response by using their patients (Table 4).
N | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Reasons for recommending dietary supplements* | Expectation of positive treatment effect | 52 | 85.2 |
Requests by patients | 24 | 39.3 | |
Availability of a product manufactured by a reputable company | 22 | 36.1 | |
Sufficient evidence | 16 | 26.2 | |
Quality of product has been proven | 10 | 16.4 | |
Prevention of dry eye | 9 | 14.7 | |
Yielding a profit | 1 | 1.6 | |
Patient feedback on supplement use | Excellent | 2 | 3 |
Very good | 13 | 21 | |
Good | 27 | 44 | |
No change | 19 | 31 | |
Worsening of condition | 0 | 0 | |
Supplements ingredients recommended to dry eye patients* | Lactoferrin | 44 | 72.1 |
Omega-3 fatty acids (DHA, EPA) | 37 | 60.7 | |
Lactic acid bacterium | 34 | 55.7 | |
Lutein | 22 | 36.1 | |
Anthocyanin | 13 | 21.3 | |
Astaxanthin | 12 | 19.7 | |
Vitamin E | 12 | 19.7 | |
Vitamin A | 8 | 13.1 | |
Vitamin C | 7 | 11.5 | |
Multi-vitamin product | 8 | 13.1 | |
Vitamin B2 | 5 | 8.2 | |
Hyaluronate sodium | 4 | 6.6 | |
Co-enzyme Q10 | 4 | 6.6 | |
Vitamin B12 | 4 | 6.6 | |
Zinc | 4 | 6.6 | |
Others | 20 | 32.8 |
DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid *Multiple answers were allowed.
Table 4: Reasons for recommending dietary supplements and types of supplements (N = 61).
The ophthalmologists who reported not recommending dietary supplements to their patients cited the following top three reasons: 1) lack of evidence (54.8%), 2) lack of information on which types of supplements to recommend to patients (38.5%), and 3) high cost (increasing the patients' charges (35.6%) (Table 5).
N | % | |
---|---|---|
Lack of evidence | 74 | 54.8 |
Lack of information on which supplement to recommended to patients | 52 | 38.5 |
High cost (increasing patients' charges) | 48 | 35.6 |
Patients are unlikely to buy supplements | 32 | 23.7 |
Not believing that supplements are effective | 27 | 20.0 |
Unclear synergistic effects with other supplements or drugs | 23 | 17.0 |
Bothersome to explain the supplements to patients such as how to use and side effects | 16 | 11.9 |
It not being an approved medication | 15 | 11.1 |
Worry about excessive taking of ingredients | 11 | 8.1 |
Little profit for the clinic | 3 | 2.2 |
Do not want overdose of dietary supplement | 2 | 1.5 |
Manufacturer of supplement is not trustworthy | 1 | 0.7 |
Others | 10 | 7.4 |
No answer | 10 | 7.4 |
Table 5: Reasons cited by ophthalmologists for not recommending dietarysupplements to dry eye patients (N = 135).
Regarding their own approach to a healthy diet and lifestyle, the majority of the ophthalmologist reported implementing at least some types of health behaviors such as exercise, positive thinking, and dietary restrictions; only 3.1% reporting doing nothing to improve their health (Table 6). Of all surveyed ophthalmologists, 62.2% stated that they currently were using dietary supplements. In contrast, 37.8% never used any supplements; they cited “bothersome to continue to take” as their main reason. The majority of surveyed ophthalmologists stated that sufficient evidence is required as the main prerequisite for using dietary supplements personally.
Self-care (health) | N | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-smoking | 151 | 77.0 | ||
Exercising regularly | 107 | 54.6 | ||
Positive thinking | 93 | 47.4 | ||
Early bed time, early wake up | 71 | 36.2 | ||
Dietary habits | Calorie restriction | 107 | 54.6 | |
Carbohydrate-restricted diet | 90 | 45.9 | ||
Fat-restricted diet | 49 | 25.0 | ||
Eating fiber-rich foods | 97 | 49.5 | ||
Eating foods containing lactic acid bacteria | 90 | 45.9 | ||
Adequate hydration | 105 | 53.6 | ||
Appropriate alcohol intake | 54 | 27.6 | ||
Others | 7 | 3.6 | ||
Others | 14 | 7.1 | ||
No self-care, as per above | 6 | 3.1 | ||
Personal use of dietary supplements | ||||
Current use) | ||||
a. Regular use (daily) | 83 | 42.3 | ||
b. Every 2 to 3days | 12 | 6.1 | ||
c. Occasional use | 27 | 13.8 | ||
Never used dietary supplements | 74 | 37.8 | ||
For those reporting that they never used dietary supplements (N = 74) | ||||
Reasons for not using supplements | Bothersome to continue to take | 37 | 50.0 | |
Do not believe that they are effective | 24 | 32.4 | ||
Lack of evidence | 22 | 29.7 | ||
Do not know which is the best supplement for me | 14 | 18.9 | ||
It not being an approved medication | 9 | 12.2 | ||
High cost | 8 | 10.8 | ||
Worry about excessive taking of ingredients | 7 | 9.5 | ||
Unclear synergistic effect with other supplements or drugs | 6 | 8.1 | ||
Bad taste, difficult to swallow | 5 | 6.8 | ||
do not want overdose of dietary supplement | 3 | 4.1 | ||
Manufacturer of supplement is not trustworthy | 3 | 4.1 | ||
Difficult to buy | 2 | 2.7 | ||
Others | 4 | 5.4 | ||
Prerequisites for personally taking supplements | Sufficient evidence | 56 | 75.7 | |
Easy to swallow | 23 | 31.1 | ||
High quality | 22 | 29.7 | ||
Reasonable price | 21 | 28.4 | ||
Easy to buy | 20 | 27.0 | ||
Others | 6 | 8.1 | ||
No answer | 3 | 4.1 |
Table 6: Ophthalmologists’ health-related habits and personal use of supplements (N = 196).
Discussion
We conducted a survey to ophthalmologists on their dietary supplement recommendation to their patients and their personal use of supplements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this supplement usage in Japan. Our survey revealed that the majority (67.9%) of the Japanese ophthalmologists included in this study recommended dietary supplements to their patients. The main target diseases included age-related macular degeneration (97.0%), followed by dry eye (45.9%, most commonly, lactoferrin, DHA/EPA, and lactic acid bacterium). Those who reported not recommending dietary supplements cited lack of evidence, lack of information on which supplements to recommend to patients, and high cost as their main reasons. Many ophthalmologists (62.2%) reported currently using dietary supplements.
The efficacy of dietary supplements to treat age-related macular degeneration is already widely recognized among Japanese ophthalmologists based on available evidence; this is strongly supported by the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) report [9-12]. Notably, we found that almost half of the ophthalmologists in this study recommended supplements to treat dry eye. Dry eye disease is linked to aging and has been shown to be associated with oxidative stress [13,14]. In our study, 31.1% of the ophthalmologists reported using supplements in addition to eye drops in practice to treat dry eye. This survey was launched approximately one year after the dietary supplement Optiade DE (WAKAMOTO, Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) for the treatment of dry eye became available; we hypothesize that the rate of its use will be increasing. In this study, the main three ingredients the ophthalmologists recommended to their patients were lactoferrin, DHA/EPA, and lactic acid bacterium. These are included in Optiade DE, whose efficacy and safety have already been confirmed [15]. Thus, this product which includes combination of lactoferrin, DHA/EPA and lactic acid bacterium might be already recognized among supplement recommended ophthalmologists; a total of 68% of those who recommended dietary supplements received a good response for dry eye treatments.
We found out that the ophthalmologists who reported not recommending dietary supplements to their patients stated a lack of evidence (54.8%) and lack of information on what supplement to recommend to patients (38.5%) as their main reasons. The efficacy and safety of several dietary supplement products are being assessed in Japan.
In this study, 62.2% of the ophthalmologists reported currently using dietary supplements. Previous reports in the USA reported a prevalence of regular dietary supplement intake among healthcare professionals of between 70% and 80% [16-19]. Thus, the rate in our study is relatively low. It is possible that Japanese physicians are more critical of supplement use. Importantly, 75.7% stated that sufficient evidence is required for recommending dietary supplements.
With the increased use of dietary supplements in Japan, adverse events related to supplement intake have been reported [20]. Reports on such adverse events should be considered when treating dry eye disease. More evidence is required for the safe use of dietary supplements.
This study has several limitations. As the ophthalmologists included in this study were members of the Dry Eye Society in Japan, the study sample might not be representative of Japanese ophthalmologists. The average age of the ophthalmologists we surveyed was 50.2 years, and they showed a very high level of adopting healthy habits. These factors might have affected our results (i.e., since they adopted healthy habits themselves, they might have recommended more supplements). The relatively small number of respondents is an additional limitation.
Conclusion
In our study, 45.9 % of the ophthalmologists recommend dietary supplements to their dry eye patients. The vast majority reported adopting a healthy lifestyle (96.9%) and 62.2% stated currently using dietary supplements regularly as part of their own approach to a healthy diet and lifestyle. More evidence and information on dietary supplements should be required for their appropriate and safe use.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved prospectively by the Ethical Review Board of the Haneginomori Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Availability of Data and Material
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.
Competing Interests
This study was funded by Dry Eye Society.
Funding
This study was funded by Dry Eye Society. Dry Eye Society had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Authors' Contributions
MK and TK designed the study. MK wrote the manuscript and TK revised the manuscript. They approved the final manuscript.