Jose G De la Mora Levy1* and Maria-Fernanda Torres-Ruiz2
1Department Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
2Weil-Cornell Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, USA
- *Corresponding Author:
- Jose G de la Mora-Levy
Director of EUS & Co-Director of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy
Endoscopy Department
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Av. San Fernando No. 22, Col. Seccion XVI
Tlalpan; C.P. 14080
Phone: +55-56-280400
E-mail: guillermodelamora@yahoo.com
Received date: April 20th, 2016 Accepted date: May 10th, 2016
Keywords
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Pancreatic Neoplasms
Abbreviations
EUS Endoscopic ultrasound; FNA Fine-needle aspiration;
The role of ERCP is quite well-established in endoscopy practice; multicentric, comparative studies [1] and meta-analysis [2] have further contributed to clarify ERCP strengths and limits [3, 4]. Recent developments such as pancreatoscopy, have become more easily available [5]. Since the introduction of EUS into clinical practice, more than 30 years have passed, however it is not until practitioners realized the diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities of mainly linear Endoscopy, that EUS has shown such a meteoric rise.
Although quite evident for many of the "older" practitioners (corresponding author included- linear EUS, 20 years ago), ERCP & EUS belong with each other in the management of Pancreatic Disease [6]; it is only until 10 years ago that the floodgates were opened. This happened because of the more than obvious advantages of performing multiple procedures in one patient at one sitting. Training in EUS by including this technique in the one-year Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship instead of having to “choose” one or the other (that is EUS or Advanced Endoscopy), also produced a larger number of endosonography practitioners. Specially designed accessories with therapeutic EUS in mind contributed also, albeit still lacking in variety compared the ones available for other endoscopic procedures [7].
Established indications, such as FNA [8] or core biopsy for the diagnosis of diverse solid or cystic pancreatic benign or malignant conditions [9, 10], EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Block or Neurolysis for the treatment of pain associated to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer [11] and pseudocyst or peripancreatic collection drainage[12, 13, 14], have now become standard practice as well as accepted first line options in the diagnosis and treatment of collegiate and evidence-based collaborations such as National Cancer Center Network guidelines [15]. Other invasive procedures using EUS as guidance are in line for widespread clinical use, such as biliary drainage in obstructive pancreatic malignant tumors [16, 17] and procedures to access the main pancreatic in difficult cases and working in concert with ERCP [18]. Upcoming procedures (not yet widespread) revolutionary in-vivo, real-time imaging of the pancreatic parenchyma or cystic tumor walls such as Confocal-Laser Endomicroscopy [19], Elastography [20] and Contrast-Enhanced EUS imaging [21] has just recently shown to be useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia in difficult cases, by providing more specificity. Blood sampling from portal vessels to capture pancreatic cancer cells, not only provides a diagnosis of cancer cells with metastatic potential but also provides together with FNA, a sample of the microenvironment that can be used in basic research [22]. EUS as the method of choice for screening and surveillance of patients at high-risk for development of pancreatic cancer is being studied at numerous Centers [23].
Other advances include direct endoscopic treatment of pancreatic cancer, such as Ethanol Injection or Paclitaxel [24, 25] of selected cystic neoplasms or injection of a reproducible, effective agent [26] directly into the tumor under EUS. Radio-Frecuency Ablation has also recently appeared, to deliver energy into the bile duct in cases of pancreatic cancer as well as into cystic or solid neoplasms in the pancreatic parenchyma. The Future is bright for Pancreatic Endoscopy [27]. Hail to the “new” Queen!!!
Conflict of Interest
Corresponding Author is share-holder of Axios- Stent, Boston Scientific, Inc. and Consultant for Olympus (Mexico).
References
- Ahmed AU, Issa Y, Bruno MJ, van Goor H, van Santvoort H, Busch OR, Dejong CH, et al. Early surgery versus optimal current step-up practice for chronic pancreatitis (ESCAPE): design and rationale of a randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterology 2013;13:49 [PMID: 23506415]
- Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, Rauws EA, Boermeester MA, Busch OR, et.al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:676-84. [PMID: 17301298]
- Ahmed Ali U, Pahlplatz JM, Nealon WH, van Goor H, Gooszen HG, Boermeester MA. Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 3:CD007884. [PMID: 22258975]
- Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, Cash BD, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012; 75:467-473. [PMID: 22341094]
- Shah RJ. Innovations in Intraductal Endoscopy: Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25:779-92. [PMID: 26431604]
- Hollerbach S. EUS and ERCP: brothers in arms. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68:467-9. [PMID: 18760174]
- Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012;75:870–876 [PMID: 22301347]
- Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan K. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:319-31 [PMID: 22248600]
- Emerson RE, Randolph ML, Cramer HM. Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is highly predictive of pancreatic neoplasia. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006; 34:457-462 [PMID: 16783773]
- Kamisawa T, Ohara H, Kim MH, Kanno A, Okazaki K, Fujita N. Role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Endosc 2014; 26:627-35. [PMID: 24712522]
- Kaufman M, Singh G, Das S, Concha-Parra R, Erber J, Micames C, Gress F. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2010;44:127-134 [PMID: 19826273]
- Rotman SR, Kahaleh M. Pancreatic Fluid Collection Drainage by Endoscopic Ultrasound: New Perspectives. Endoscopic Ultrasound 2012;1:61-68 [PMID: 24949339]
- Binmoeller KF. EUS-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections Using Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2013; 9:442-444 [PMID: 23935553]
- Giovannini M, Pesenti CH, Rolland AL, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope. Endoscopy 2001; 33:473-477 [PMID: 11437038]
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Version 1.2016. at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/gl_steering_committee.asp
- Khashab MA, Levy MJ, Itoi T, Artifon EL. EUS-guided biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82:993-1001[PMID: 26384159]
- Ikeuchi N, Itoi T. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic puncture. Gastrointestinal Intervention 2015; 4:31–39.
- Will U, Reichel A, Fueldner F, Meyer F. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage for patients with symptomatic obstruction and enlargement of the pancreatic duct. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:13140-51. [PMID: 26674313]
- Konda VJ1, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, Siddiqui UD, Hart J, Waxman I. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS-FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:1049-60. [PMID: 21924718]
- Kongkam P, Lakananurak N, Navicharern P, Chantarojanasiri T, Aye K, Ridtitid W, Kritisin K, et al. Combination of EUS-FNA and elastography (strain ratio) to exclude malignant solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective single-blinded study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30:1683-9. [PMID: 26238152]
- Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R, Pujol B, Lefort C, Lepilliez V, Labadie M, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42:564-70. [PMID:20593334]
- Catenacci DV, Chapman CG, Xu P, Koons A, Konda VJ, Siddiqui UD, Waxman I. Acquisition of portal venous circulating tumor cells from patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers by endoscopic ultrasound. Gastroenterology 2015; 149:1794-1803. [PMID: 26341722]
- Hanada K, Okazaki A, Hirano N, Izumi Y, Minami T, Ikemoto J, Kanemitsu K, et al. Effective screening for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29:929-39. [PMID: 26651254]
- Oh HC, Seo DW, Song TJ, Moon SH, Park do H, Soo Lee S, Lee SK, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided ethanol lavage with paclitaxel injection treats patients with pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2011; 140:172-9. [PMID: 20950614]
- Brugge WR. Diagnosis and management of cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:375-88. [PMID: 26261724]
- Sun G, Anderson MA, Gorospe EC, Leggett CL, Lutzke LS, Wong Kee Song LM, Levy M, et al. Synergistic effects of photodynamic therapy with HPPH and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44:755-61. [PMID: 23018618]
- Pai M, Habib N, Senturk H, Lakhtakia S, Reddy N, Cicinnati VR, Kaba I, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation, for pancreatic cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 27:52-9. [PMID: 25914783]