Articles published in Quality in Primary Care have been cited by esteemed scholars and scientists all around the world. Quality in Primary Care has got h-index 27, which means every article in Quality in Primary Care has got 27 average citations.
Following are the list of articles that have cited the articles published in Quality in Primary Care.
2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year wise published articles |
63 | 58 | 21 | 24 | 21 |
Year wise citations received |
61 | 57 | 21 | 24 | 21 |
Journal total citations count | 3264 |
Journal impact factor | 4.22 |
Journal 5 years impact factor | 7.36 |
Journal cite score | 6.64 |
Journal h-index | 27 |
Journal Impact Factor 2020 formula |
IF= Citations(y)/{Publications(y-1)+ Publications(y-2)} Y= Year |
Journal 5-year Impact Factor 2020 formula |
Citations(2016 + 2017 + 2018 + 2019 + 2020)/ {Published articles(2016 + 2017 + 2018 + 2019 + 2020)} |
Journal citescore |
Citescorey = Citationsy + Citationsy-1 + Citationsy-2 + Citations y-3 / Published articlesy + Published articlesy-1 + Published articlesy-2 + Published articles y-3 |
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92. |
|
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16. |
|
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16. |
|
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16. |
|